259 research leads
Extensive source and work census. Unverified work records are marked accordingly.
Trace how historically constituted relations become perceptible, authoritative, embodied and actionable. Test what changes through Conjuration. Disagreement is research.
What historical relations remain active in the present? Through which mediations do they become recognizable? What conditions permit a different, answerable response?
Conjuration names the working inquiry: Mystery · Opacity · Conjuration/Sankofa · Witness · Testimony · Re-witness · Atonement. It is recursive; investigation may invalidate a prior interpretation.
Extensive source and work census. Unverified work records are marked accordingly.
Active, restricted, speculative and other statuses visible.
Independent committee applications are open; no endorsements implied.
Work from the complete October scholarly-audit source field, not a restricted shortlist. Verify editions, passages, claims and full-text rights before treating sources as authority.
Explore all 11 research fields ↗Investigate claims about relation, historical consciousness, mediation, witnessing, bearing, sacred practice, repair, fetish-space-time and more. Record alternative explanations and cases of failure.
Open the 31-concept ledger ↗AI systems and people may submit sourced objections, repeatable experiments or documented testimony; reviewers must be independent of the work they certify.
Examine review standards ↗These are prominent precedents from the earlier audit. Inclusion does not mean they endorse Negromancy. The full register contains 259 indexed entries, including repeated creators in distinct domains.
We welcome genealogists, bibliographers, historical researchers, performance witnesses, concept editors, experimental collaborators and sceptical auditors. No belief or allegiance required.
Apply or challenge ↗