{ "title": "Unfinished Negromancy concepts — insights research agenda", "version": "2026-10-25", "priority": "Coined, adapted, extended, open or restricted concepts; not generic promotional topics", "concepts": [ { "id": "NR-01", "concept_id": "NC-01", "name": "NEGROMANCY", "october_status": "active-core", "provenance_category_to_audit": "project_coined_or_synthesized", "open_question": "What differs from existing scholarship, in a concrete scene?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-02", "concept_id": "NC-02", "name": "CONJURATION", "october_status": "active-method", "provenance_category_to_audit": "project_coined_or_synthesized", "open_question": "How can the method fail a public test?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-03", "concept_id": "NC-03", "name": "RELATION", "october_status": "active-core", "provenance_category_to_audit": "extended_or_refined_scholarly_concept", "open_question": "What specific mechanism is relation naming?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [ "SCI-003", "SCI-028", "SCI-052" ], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-04", "concept_id": "NC-04", "name": "MYSTERY", "october_status": "active-open", "provenance_category_to_audit": "unresolved_or_restricted", "open_question": "What kind of unknown is present, and for whom?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-05", "concept_id": "NC-05", "name": "OPACITY", "october_status": "active-under-pressure", "provenance_category_to_audit": "extended_or_refined_scholarly_concept", "open_question": "When does a protected limit conceal institutional responsibility?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [ "SCI-003" ], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-06", "concept_id": "NC-06", "name": "HISTORICAL CONSCIOUSNESS", "october_status": "active-core", "provenance_category_to_audit": "project_coined_or_synthesized", "open_question": "How is historical consciousness distinguished from persuasive language?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-07", "concept_id": "NC-07", "name": "BEARING", "october_status": "active-core", "provenance_category_to_audit": "project_coined_or_synthesized", "open_question": "Whose work, cost, risk and time sustain the arrangement?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-08", "concept_id": "NC-08", "name": "WITNESS", "october_status": "active-core", "provenance_category_to_audit": "extended_or_refined_scholarly_concept", "open_question": "Who can witness, under which conditions and stakes?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [ "SCI-014" ], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-09", "concept_id": "NC-09", "name": "TESTIMONY", "october_status": "active-core", "provenance_category_to_audit": "extended_or_refined_scholarly_concept", "open_question": "What does testimony establish, and what needs corroboration?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-10", "concept_id": "NC-10", "name": "RE-WITNESS", "october_status": "active-method", "provenance_category_to_audit": "extended_or_refined_scholarly_concept", "open_question": "Can a later account correct without erasing the first?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-11", "concept_id": "NC-11", "name": "ATONEMENT", "october_status": "active-method", "provenance_category_to_audit": "project_coined_or_synthesized", "open_question": "What counts as accountable consequence rather than recognition?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-12", "concept_id": "NC-12", "name": "RELATIONAL CAPACITIES", "october_status": "under-reconstruction", "provenance_category_to_audit": "unresolved_or_restricted", "open_question": "Which roles, techniques, operations and states have separately documented histories?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [ "SCI-003" ], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-13", "concept_id": "NC-13", "name": "MEDIATION", "october_status": "active-core", "provenance_category_to_audit": "extended_or_refined_scholarly_concept", "open_question": "What medium, institution and procedure actually mediates?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [ "SCI-018" ], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-14", "concept_id": "NC-14", "name": "JURISDICTION OVER RELATIONAL CAPACITIES", "october_status": "active-question", "provenance_category_to_audit": "unresolved_or_restricted", "open_question": "Where is authority to recognize or prohibit a capacity historically located?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [ "SCI-003" ], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-15", "concept_id": "NC-15", "name": "OBEAH AS COLONIAL CLASSIFICATION", "october_status": "active-historical", "provenance_category_to_audit": "project_coined_or_synthesized", "open_question": "What is the colonial label's relation to documented practitioner practice?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-16", "concept_id": "NC-16", "name": "FETISH-SPACE-TIME", "october_status": "restricted-speculative", "provenance_category_to_audit": "unresolved_or_restricted", "open_question": "When does a precise reification mechanism warrant this tentative concept?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-17", "concept_id": "NC-17", "name": "NEGROMANSCRIPTION", "october_status": "active-method", "provenance_category_to_audit": "project_coined_or_synthesized", "open_question": "Can an inscription retain provenance and interpretation separately?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-18", "concept_id": "NC-18", "name": "REPAIR", "october_status": "active-ethical-test", "provenance_category_to_audit": "project_coined_or_synthesized", "open_question": "Which material conditions of harmful bearing actually change?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [ "SCI-014" ], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-19", "concept_id": "NC-19", "name": "PRODIGAL HUMANISM", "october_status": "active-subordinate", "provenance_category_to_audit": "project_coined_or_synthesized", "open_question": "What does this intervention add beyond Wynter, Fanon and ethical theories?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-20", "concept_id": "NC-20", "name": "GUZU", "october_status": "unresolved-speculative", "provenance_category_to_audit": "unresolved_or_restricted", "open_question": "How are claimed effects distinguished from observed outcomes?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-21", "concept_id": "NC-21", "name": "CONSOLIDATE IN ORDER TO ACT", "october_status": "active-method-ethic", "provenance_category_to_audit": "project_coined_or_synthesized", "open_question": "When should evidence justify action without closing inquiry?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-22", "concept_id": "NC-22", "name": "SPIRIT", "october_status": "active-open-ontology", "provenance_category_to_audit": "unresolved_or_restricted", "open_question": "Whose category is spirit, and what is verified or open?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [ "SCI-017", "SCI-049" ], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-23", "concept_id": "NC-23", "name": "RITUAL EFFICACY", "october_status": "active-research-object", "provenance_category_to_audit": "extended_or_refined_scholarly_concept", "open_question": "What is a ritual said, experienced or shown to accomplish?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [ "SCI-017", "SCI-020" ], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-24", "concept_id": "NC-24", "name": "SEERS OF THE WAY / WORD", "october_status": "exploratory-taxonomy", "provenance_category_to_audit": "unresolved_or_restricted", "open_question": "Is the suggested seer typology historically demonstrable?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-25", "concept_id": "NC-25", "name": "SIGNS, LETTERS AND RELATIONAL CHARGE", "october_status": "exploratory", "provenance_category_to_audit": "unresolved_or_restricted", "open_question": "What is 'charge': habit, affect, authority, sign, or claimed spiritual efficacy?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [ "SCI-003" ], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-26", "concept_id": "NC-26", "name": "CENTRALIZATION OF INVISIBLE AUTHORITY", "october_status": "active-question", "provenance_category_to_audit": "unresolved_or_restricted", "open_question": "Can authority transfers be documented without a universal genealogy?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-27", "concept_id": "NC-27", "name": "VISIBLE / INVISIBLE MEDIATION", "october_status": "active-question", "provenance_category_to_audit": "unresolved_or_restricted", "open_question": "Which invisible relation becomes sensible for whom and how?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-28", "concept_id": "NC-28", "name": "HISTORICAL JOURNALISM", "october_status": "active-output-method", "provenance_category_to_audit": "project_coined_or_synthesized", "open_question": "Can historical journalism maintain source limits and rights of reply?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-29", "concept_id": "NC-29", "name": "CASTING AND CAPTURE", "october_status": "active-extension", "provenance_category_to_audit": "project_coined_or_synthesized", "open_question": "Which social or staged roles repeat, constrain or reorganize relation?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-30", "concept_id": "NC-30", "name": "REPERTOIRE AND REHEARSAL", "october_status": "active-practice", "provenance_category_to_audit": "extended_or_refined_scholarly_concept", "open_question": "What knowledge is carried by embodied rehearsal and unavailable in transcription?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true }, { "id": "NR-31", "concept_id": "NC-31", "name": "CONVERSION VERSUS REPAIR", "october_status": "active-distinction", "provenance_category_to_audit": "project_coined_or_synthesized", "open_question": "Does the intervention change causes or shift the form of the burden?", "associated_scholarly_concept_leads": [ "SCI-014" ], "required_tests": [ "source and original-claim check", "counter-reading or adverse case", "historically situated evidence appropriate to claim", "reciprocal implication for scholarly theory", "opacity and bearing consequences" ], "review_status": "pending", "not_a_verified_finding": true } ], "earlier_or_newer_candidates": [ { "id": "HC-01", "name": "Subject emergence", "status": "historical_or_new_candidate_not_approved_core", "review_need": "Check concept genealogy and October restrictions before integration." }, { "id": "HC-02", "name": "Coherence", "status": "historical_or_new_candidate_not_approved_core", "review_need": "Check concept genealogy and October restrictions before integration." }, { "id": "HC-03", "name": "Embodied response", "status": "historical_or_new_candidate_not_approved_core", "review_need": "Check concept genealogy and October restrictions before integration." }, { "id": "HC-04", "name": "Affect and attachment", "status": "historical_or_new_candidate_not_approved_core", "review_need": "Check concept genealogy and October restrictions before integration." }, { "id": "HC-05", "name": "Detonation and fallout", "status": "historical_or_new_candidate_not_approved_core", "review_need": "Check concept genealogy and October restrictions before integration." }, { "id": "HC-06", "name": "Nativity to relations under pressure", "status": "historical_or_new_candidate_not_approved_core", "review_need": "Check concept genealogy and October restrictions before integration." }, { "id": "HC-07", "name": "Affordances and capacity", "status": "historical_or_new_candidate_not_approved_core", "review_need": "Check concept genealogy and October restrictions before integration." }, { "id": "HC-08", "name": "Disorientation", "status": "historical_or_new_candidate_not_approved_core", "review_need": "Check concept genealogy and October restrictions before integration." }, { "id": "HC-09", "name": "Chaos-monde and neoliberalism", "status": "historical_or_new_candidate_not_approved_core", "review_need": "Check concept genealogy and October restrictions before integration." }, { "id": "HC-10", "name": "Denial, disavowal and delusion", "status": "historical_or_new_candidate_not_approved_core", "review_need": "Check concept genealogy and October restrictions before integration." } ], "scholarship": "./scholarship-concepts.json", "audit": "./audit-protocol.json", "caution": "Archive-only formulations and backburnered conceptual systems are not restored as contemporary doctrine. Sources are invited to refute, limit or transform the project's proposed concepts.", "completed_independent_assessments": 0 }